An interlaboratory investigation of intrinsic dissolution rate determination using surface dissolution

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

An interlaboratory investigation of intrinsic dissolution rate determination using surface dissolution. / Etherson, Kelly; Dunn, Claire; Matthews, Wayne; Pamelund, Henrik; Barragat, Camille; Sanderson, Natalie; Izumi, Toshiko; Mathews, Claudia da Costa; Halbert, Gavin; Wilson, Clive; McAllister, Mark; Mann, James; Ostergaard, Jesper; Butler, James; Khadra, Ibrahim.

In: European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, Vol. 150, 2020, p. 24-32.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Etherson, K, Dunn, C, Matthews, W, Pamelund, H, Barragat, C, Sanderson, N, Izumi, T, Mathews, CDC, Halbert, G, Wilson, C, McAllister, M, Mann, J, Ostergaard, J, Butler, J & Khadra, I 2020, 'An interlaboratory investigation of intrinsic dissolution rate determination using surface dissolution', European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, vol. 150, pp. 24-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2020.02.005

APA

Etherson, K., Dunn, C., Matthews, W., Pamelund, H., Barragat, C., Sanderson, N., Izumi, T., Mathews, C. D. C., Halbert, G., Wilson, C., McAllister, M., Mann, J., Ostergaard, J., Butler, J., & Khadra, I. (2020). An interlaboratory investigation of intrinsic dissolution rate determination using surface dissolution. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 150, 24-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2020.02.005

Vancouver

Etherson K, Dunn C, Matthews W, Pamelund H, Barragat C, Sanderson N et al. An interlaboratory investigation of intrinsic dissolution rate determination using surface dissolution. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 2020;150:24-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2020.02.005

Author

Etherson, Kelly ; Dunn, Claire ; Matthews, Wayne ; Pamelund, Henrik ; Barragat, Camille ; Sanderson, Natalie ; Izumi, Toshiko ; Mathews, Claudia da Costa ; Halbert, Gavin ; Wilson, Clive ; McAllister, Mark ; Mann, James ; Ostergaard, Jesper ; Butler, James ; Khadra, Ibrahim. / An interlaboratory investigation of intrinsic dissolution rate determination using surface dissolution. In: European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 2020 ; Vol. 150. pp. 24-32.

Bibtex

@article{67ad89b658fe4732b977611cd47ea1c0,
title = "An interlaboratory investigation of intrinsic dissolution rate determination using surface dissolution",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to conduct an interlaboratory ring-study, with six partners (academic and industrial), investigating the measurement of intrinsic dissolution rate (IDR) using surface dissolution imaging (SDI) equipment. Measurement of IDR is important in pharmaceutical research as it provides characterising information on drugs and their formulations. This work allowed us to assess the SDI's interlaboratory performance for measuring IDR using a defined standard operating procedure (see supporting information) and six drugs assigned as low (tadalafil, bromocriptine mesylate), medium (carvedilol, indomethacin) and high (ibuprofen, valsartan) solubility compounds. Fasted State Simulated Intestinal Fluid (FaSSIF) and blank FaSSIF (without sodium taurocholate and lecithin) (pH 6.5) were used as media. Using the standardised protocol an IDR value was obtained for all compounds and the results show that the overall IDR rank order matched the solubility rank order. Interlaboratory variability was also examined and it was observed that the variability for lower solubility compounds was higher, coefficient of variation > 50%, than for intermediate and high solubility compounds, with the exception of indomethacin in FaSSIF medium. Inter laboratory variability is a useful descriptor for understanding the robustness of the protocol and the system variability. On comparison to another published small-scale IDR study the rank ordering with respect to dissolution rate is identical except for the high solubility compounds. This results indicates that the SDI robustly measures IDR however, no recommendation on the use of one small scale method over the other is made.",
keywords = "Intrinsic dissolution rate (IDR), Orbito, Dissolution, Fasted State Simulated Intestinal Fluid (FaSSIF), Surface Dissolution Imaging (SDI), Gastro Intestinal Tract (GIT), IN-VIVO PERFORMANCE, BIOPHARMACEUTIC DRUG CLASSIFICATION, MEDIATED PHASE-TRANSFORMATIONS, INTESTINAL FLUIDS, PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES, BIORELEVANT DISSOLUTION, WEAK ACIDS, SOLUBILITY, DIFFUSION, PH",
author = "Kelly Etherson and Claire Dunn and Wayne Matthews and Henrik Pamelund and Camille Barragat and Natalie Sanderson and Toshiko Izumi and Mathews, {Claudia da Costa} and Gavin Halbert and Clive Wilson and Mark McAllister and James Mann and Jesper Ostergaard and James Butler and Ibrahim Khadra",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejpb.2020.02.005",
language = "English",
volume = "150",
pages = "24--32",
journal = "European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics",
issn = "0939-6411",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - An interlaboratory investigation of intrinsic dissolution rate determination using surface dissolution

AU - Etherson, Kelly

AU - Dunn, Claire

AU - Matthews, Wayne

AU - Pamelund, Henrik

AU - Barragat, Camille

AU - Sanderson, Natalie

AU - Izumi, Toshiko

AU - Mathews, Claudia da Costa

AU - Halbert, Gavin

AU - Wilson, Clive

AU - McAllister, Mark

AU - Mann, James

AU - Ostergaard, Jesper

AU - Butler, James

AU - Khadra, Ibrahim

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - The purpose of this study was to conduct an interlaboratory ring-study, with six partners (academic and industrial), investigating the measurement of intrinsic dissolution rate (IDR) using surface dissolution imaging (SDI) equipment. Measurement of IDR is important in pharmaceutical research as it provides characterising information on drugs and their formulations. This work allowed us to assess the SDI's interlaboratory performance for measuring IDR using a defined standard operating procedure (see supporting information) and six drugs assigned as low (tadalafil, bromocriptine mesylate), medium (carvedilol, indomethacin) and high (ibuprofen, valsartan) solubility compounds. Fasted State Simulated Intestinal Fluid (FaSSIF) and blank FaSSIF (without sodium taurocholate and lecithin) (pH 6.5) were used as media. Using the standardised protocol an IDR value was obtained for all compounds and the results show that the overall IDR rank order matched the solubility rank order. Interlaboratory variability was also examined and it was observed that the variability for lower solubility compounds was higher, coefficient of variation > 50%, than for intermediate and high solubility compounds, with the exception of indomethacin in FaSSIF medium. Inter laboratory variability is a useful descriptor for understanding the robustness of the protocol and the system variability. On comparison to another published small-scale IDR study the rank ordering with respect to dissolution rate is identical except for the high solubility compounds. This results indicates that the SDI robustly measures IDR however, no recommendation on the use of one small scale method over the other is made.

AB - The purpose of this study was to conduct an interlaboratory ring-study, with six partners (academic and industrial), investigating the measurement of intrinsic dissolution rate (IDR) using surface dissolution imaging (SDI) equipment. Measurement of IDR is important in pharmaceutical research as it provides characterising information on drugs and their formulations. This work allowed us to assess the SDI's interlaboratory performance for measuring IDR using a defined standard operating procedure (see supporting information) and six drugs assigned as low (tadalafil, bromocriptine mesylate), medium (carvedilol, indomethacin) and high (ibuprofen, valsartan) solubility compounds. Fasted State Simulated Intestinal Fluid (FaSSIF) and blank FaSSIF (without sodium taurocholate and lecithin) (pH 6.5) were used as media. Using the standardised protocol an IDR value was obtained for all compounds and the results show that the overall IDR rank order matched the solubility rank order. Interlaboratory variability was also examined and it was observed that the variability for lower solubility compounds was higher, coefficient of variation > 50%, than for intermediate and high solubility compounds, with the exception of indomethacin in FaSSIF medium. Inter laboratory variability is a useful descriptor for understanding the robustness of the protocol and the system variability. On comparison to another published small-scale IDR study the rank ordering with respect to dissolution rate is identical except for the high solubility compounds. This results indicates that the SDI robustly measures IDR however, no recommendation on the use of one small scale method over the other is made.

KW - Intrinsic dissolution rate (IDR)

KW - Orbito

KW - Dissolution

KW - Fasted State Simulated Intestinal Fluid (FaSSIF)

KW - Surface Dissolution Imaging (SDI)

KW - Gastro Intestinal Tract (GIT)

KW - IN-VIVO PERFORMANCE

KW - BIOPHARMACEUTIC DRUG CLASSIFICATION

KW - MEDIATED PHASE-TRANSFORMATIONS

KW - INTESTINAL FLUIDS

KW - PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES

KW - BIORELEVANT DISSOLUTION

KW - WEAK ACIDS

KW - SOLUBILITY

KW - DIFFUSION

KW - PH

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejpb.2020.02.005

DO - 10.1016/j.ejpb.2020.02.005

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32061919

VL - 150

SP - 24

EP - 32

JO - European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics

JF - European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics

SN - 0939-6411

ER -

ID: 245618598