Promoting social distancing in a pandemic: Beyond good intentions

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Promoting social distancing in a pandemic : Beyond good intentions. / Falco, Paolo; Zaccagni, Sarah.

In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 16, No. 12, e0260457, 02.12.2021.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Falco, P & Zaccagni, S 2021, 'Promoting social distancing in a pandemic: Beyond good intentions', PLoS ONE, vol. 16, no. 12, e0260457. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260457

APA

Falco, P., & Zaccagni, S. (2021). Promoting social distancing in a pandemic: Beyond good intentions. PLoS ONE, 16(12), [ e0260457]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260457

Vancouver

Falco P, Zaccagni S. Promoting social distancing in a pandemic: Beyond good intentions. PLoS ONE. 2021 Dec 2;16(12). e0260457. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260457

Author

Falco, Paolo ; Zaccagni, Sarah. / Promoting social distancing in a pandemic : Beyond good intentions. In: PLoS ONE. 2021 ; Vol. 16, No. 12.

Bibtex

@article{91131ba70f1c4b668d35e52dd60a6f98,
title = "Promoting social distancing in a pandemic: Beyond good intentions",
abstract = "Do reminders to promote social distancing achieve the desired effects on behavior? Much of the existing literature analyses impacts on people{\textquoteright}s intentions to comply. We run a randomised controlled trial in Denmark to test different versions of a reminder to stay home at the beginning of the crisis. Using a two-stage design, we follow up with recipients and analyse their subsequent self-reported behaviour. We find that the reminder increases ex-ante intentions to comply when it emphasises the consequences of non-compliance for the subjects themselves and their families, while it has no effect when the emphasis is on other people or the country as a whole. We also find, however, that impacts on intentions do not translate into equivalent impacts on actions. Only people in poor health react to the reminder by staying home significantly more. Our results shed light on important gaps between people{\textquoteright}s intentions and their actions in responding to the recommendations of health authorities.",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, Medical risk factors, Questionnaires, Social distancing, COVID-19, Pandemics, Virus testing, Surveys, Behavioural and social aspects of health",
author = "Paolo Falco and Sarah Zaccagni",
year = "2021",
month = dec,
day = "2",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0260457",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
journal = "PLoS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Promoting social distancing in a pandemic

T2 - Beyond good intentions

AU - Falco, Paolo

AU - Zaccagni, Sarah

PY - 2021/12/2

Y1 - 2021/12/2

N2 - Do reminders to promote social distancing achieve the desired effects on behavior? Much of the existing literature analyses impacts on people’s intentions to comply. We run a randomised controlled trial in Denmark to test different versions of a reminder to stay home at the beginning of the crisis. Using a two-stage design, we follow up with recipients and analyse their subsequent self-reported behaviour. We find that the reminder increases ex-ante intentions to comply when it emphasises the consequences of non-compliance for the subjects themselves and their families, while it has no effect when the emphasis is on other people or the country as a whole. We also find, however, that impacts on intentions do not translate into equivalent impacts on actions. Only people in poor health react to the reminder by staying home significantly more. Our results shed light on important gaps between people’s intentions and their actions in responding to the recommendations of health authorities.

AB - Do reminders to promote social distancing achieve the desired effects on behavior? Much of the existing literature analyses impacts on people’s intentions to comply. We run a randomised controlled trial in Denmark to test different versions of a reminder to stay home at the beginning of the crisis. Using a two-stage design, we follow up with recipients and analyse their subsequent self-reported behaviour. We find that the reminder increases ex-ante intentions to comply when it emphasises the consequences of non-compliance for the subjects themselves and their families, while it has no effect when the emphasis is on other people or the country as a whole. We also find, however, that impacts on intentions do not translate into equivalent impacts on actions. Only people in poor health react to the reminder by staying home significantly more. Our results shed light on important gaps between people’s intentions and their actions in responding to the recommendations of health authorities.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - Medical risk factors

KW - Questionnaires

KW - Social distancing

KW - COVID-19

KW - Pandemics

KW - Virus testing

KW - Surveys

KW - Behavioural and social aspects of health

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0260457

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0260457

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 34855825

VL - 16

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 12

M1 - e0260457

ER -

ID: 291119296