Pharmaceutical policy and the lay public

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Pharmaceutical policy and the lay public. / Traulsen, Janine M; Almarsdóttir, Anna Birna.

In: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, Vol. 27, No. 4, 08.2005, p. 273-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Traulsen, JM & Almarsdóttir, AB 2005, 'Pharmaceutical policy and the lay public', International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 273-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-005-8512-6

APA

Traulsen, J. M., & Almarsdóttir, A. B. (2005). Pharmaceutical policy and the lay public. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 27(4), 273-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-005-8512-6

Vancouver

Traulsen JM, Almarsdóttir AB. Pharmaceutical policy and the lay public. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy. 2005 Aug;27(4):273-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-005-8512-6

Author

Traulsen, Janine M ; Almarsdóttir, Anna Birna. / Pharmaceutical policy and the lay public. In: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy. 2005 ; Vol. 27, No. 4. pp. 273-7.

Bibtex

@article{48f7110dac2543edb5cd3856e21c7d6c,
title = "Pharmaceutical policy and the lay public",
abstract = "Almost every national and supranational health policy document accords high importance to the need to listen to and 'empower' patients. The relationship between pharmaceutical policy and the lay public is not direct but mediated by several actors, including health care workers, patient organisations, industry and, most recently, the media. Although the overall aim of health and pharmaceutical policy is to address the needs of all citizens, there are only a few, well organised groups who are actually consulted and involved in the policymaking process, often with the support of the industry. The reasons for this lack of citizen involvement in health and pharmaceutical policymaking are many, for example: there is no consensus about what public involvement means; there is a predominance of special interest groups with narrow, specific agendas; not all decision makers welcome lay participation; patients and professionals have different rationalities with regard to their views on medicine. Because the lay public and medicine users are not one entity, one of the many challenges facing policy makers today is to identify, incorporate and prioritise the many diverse needs. The authors recommend research which includes studies that look at: lay attitudes towards pharmaceutical policy; lay experiences of drug therapy and how it affects their daily lives; the problem of identifying lay representatives; the relationship between industry and the consumers; the effect of the media on medicine users and on pharmaceutical policy itself. The authors acknowledge that although lay involvement in policy is still in its infancy, some patient organisations have been successful and there are developments towards increased lay involvement in pharmaceutical policymaking.",
keywords = "Community Participation, Drug Industry, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Health Planning, Health Policy, Humans, Mass Media, Pharmaceutical Services, Journal Article",
author = "Traulsen, {Janine M} and Almarsd{\'o}ttir, {Anna Birna}",
year = "2005",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1007/s11096-005-8512-6",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "273--7",
journal = "International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy",
issn = "2210-7703",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pharmaceutical policy and the lay public

AU - Traulsen, Janine M

AU - Almarsdóttir, Anna Birna

PY - 2005/8

Y1 - 2005/8

N2 - Almost every national and supranational health policy document accords high importance to the need to listen to and 'empower' patients. The relationship between pharmaceutical policy and the lay public is not direct but mediated by several actors, including health care workers, patient organisations, industry and, most recently, the media. Although the overall aim of health and pharmaceutical policy is to address the needs of all citizens, there are only a few, well organised groups who are actually consulted and involved in the policymaking process, often with the support of the industry. The reasons for this lack of citizen involvement in health and pharmaceutical policymaking are many, for example: there is no consensus about what public involvement means; there is a predominance of special interest groups with narrow, specific agendas; not all decision makers welcome lay participation; patients and professionals have different rationalities with regard to their views on medicine. Because the lay public and medicine users are not one entity, one of the many challenges facing policy makers today is to identify, incorporate and prioritise the many diverse needs. The authors recommend research which includes studies that look at: lay attitudes towards pharmaceutical policy; lay experiences of drug therapy and how it affects their daily lives; the problem of identifying lay representatives; the relationship between industry and the consumers; the effect of the media on medicine users and on pharmaceutical policy itself. The authors acknowledge that although lay involvement in policy is still in its infancy, some patient organisations have been successful and there are developments towards increased lay involvement in pharmaceutical policymaking.

AB - Almost every national and supranational health policy document accords high importance to the need to listen to and 'empower' patients. The relationship between pharmaceutical policy and the lay public is not direct but mediated by several actors, including health care workers, patient organisations, industry and, most recently, the media. Although the overall aim of health and pharmaceutical policy is to address the needs of all citizens, there are only a few, well organised groups who are actually consulted and involved in the policymaking process, often with the support of the industry. The reasons for this lack of citizen involvement in health and pharmaceutical policymaking are many, for example: there is no consensus about what public involvement means; there is a predominance of special interest groups with narrow, specific agendas; not all decision makers welcome lay participation; patients and professionals have different rationalities with regard to their views on medicine. Because the lay public and medicine users are not one entity, one of the many challenges facing policy makers today is to identify, incorporate and prioritise the many diverse needs. The authors recommend research which includes studies that look at: lay attitudes towards pharmaceutical policy; lay experiences of drug therapy and how it affects their daily lives; the problem of identifying lay representatives; the relationship between industry and the consumers; the effect of the media on medicine users and on pharmaceutical policy itself. The authors acknowledge that although lay involvement in policy is still in its infancy, some patient organisations have been successful and there are developments towards increased lay involvement in pharmaceutical policymaking.

KW - Community Participation

KW - Drug Industry

KW - Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice

KW - Health Planning

KW - Health Policy

KW - Humans

KW - Mass Media

KW - Pharmaceutical Services

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1007/s11096-005-8512-6

DO - 10.1007/s11096-005-8512-6

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 16228621

VL - 27

SP - 273

EP - 277

JO - International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

JF - International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

SN - 2210-7703

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 170601782