Liquid-phase microextraction of protein-bound drugs under non-equilibrium conditions

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Liquid-phase microextraction of protein-bound drugs under non-equilibrium conditions. / Tung, Si Ho; Pedersen-Bjergaard, Stig; Rasmussen, Knut E.

In: Analyst, Vol. 127, No. 5, 30.05.2002, p. 608-613.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Tung, SH, Pedersen-Bjergaard, S & Rasmussen, KE 2002, 'Liquid-phase microextraction of protein-bound drugs under non-equilibrium conditions', Analyst, vol. 127, no. 5, pp. 608-613. https://doi.org/10.1039/b110105f

APA

Tung, S. H., Pedersen-Bjergaard, S., & Rasmussen, K. E. (2002). Liquid-phase microextraction of protein-bound drugs under non-equilibrium conditions. Analyst, 127(5), 608-613. https://doi.org/10.1039/b110105f

Vancouver

Tung SH, Pedersen-Bjergaard S, Rasmussen KE. Liquid-phase microextraction of protein-bound drugs under non-equilibrium conditions. Analyst. 2002 May 30;127(5):608-613. https://doi.org/10.1039/b110105f

Author

Tung, Si Ho ; Pedersen-Bjergaard, Stig ; Rasmussen, Knut E. / Liquid-phase microextraction of protein-bound drugs under non-equilibrium conditions. In: Analyst. 2002 ; Vol. 127, No. 5. pp. 608-613.

Bibtex

@article{204a45f0abb344618345bb950b42e5c4,
title = "Liquid-phase microextraction of protein-bound drugs under non-equilibrium conditions",
abstract = "Recently, we introduced an inexpensive and disposable hollow fiber-based device for liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) where ionic analytes typically were extracted and preconcentrated from 1-4 mL aqueous samples (such as plasma and urine) through an organic solvent immobilized in the pores of a polypropylene hollow fiber and into a 10-25 μL volume of acceptor phase present inside the lumen of the hollow fiber. Subsequently, the acceptor phase was directly subjected to the final analysis by a chromatographic or electrophoretic method. In the present work, attention was focused on LPME of the basic drugs amphetamine, pethidine, promethazine, methadone and haloperidol characterized by substantial differences in the degree of protein binding. Drug-protein interactions in plasma resulted in reduced recoveries and substantially increased extraction times compared with extraction of the drugs from a pure water matrix. However, by addition of 5-50% methanol to the plasma samples, recoveries were comparable with LPME from water samples and ranged between 75 and 100%. The addition of methanol was found not to speed up the LPME process and extractions from plasma were performed in 45 min to reach equilibrium. Because approximately 55-70% of the final analyte concentrations were achieved within the initial 10 min of the LPME process, validation was accomplished after 10 and 45 min of LPME. In general, the results with 10 and 45 min were almost comparable, with precision data in the range 1.2-11.1% (RSD) and with linearity in the concentration range 20-1000 ng mL-1 (r = 0.999). In conclusion, excellent LPME results may be achieved in a short time under non-equilibrium conditions with a minor loss of sensitivity. In cases of drug-protein interactions, methanol may be added to ensure a high extraction recovery.",
author = "Tung, {Si Ho} and Stig Pedersen-Bjergaard and Rasmussen, {Knut E.}",
year = "2002",
month = may,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1039/b110105f",
language = "English",
volume = "127",
pages = "608--613",
journal = "The Analyst",
issn = "0003-2654",
publisher = "Royal Society of Chemistry",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Liquid-phase microextraction of protein-bound drugs under non-equilibrium conditions

AU - Tung, Si Ho

AU - Pedersen-Bjergaard, Stig

AU - Rasmussen, Knut E.

PY - 2002/5/30

Y1 - 2002/5/30

N2 - Recently, we introduced an inexpensive and disposable hollow fiber-based device for liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) where ionic analytes typically were extracted and preconcentrated from 1-4 mL aqueous samples (such as plasma and urine) through an organic solvent immobilized in the pores of a polypropylene hollow fiber and into a 10-25 μL volume of acceptor phase present inside the lumen of the hollow fiber. Subsequently, the acceptor phase was directly subjected to the final analysis by a chromatographic or electrophoretic method. In the present work, attention was focused on LPME of the basic drugs amphetamine, pethidine, promethazine, methadone and haloperidol characterized by substantial differences in the degree of protein binding. Drug-protein interactions in plasma resulted in reduced recoveries and substantially increased extraction times compared with extraction of the drugs from a pure water matrix. However, by addition of 5-50% methanol to the plasma samples, recoveries were comparable with LPME from water samples and ranged between 75 and 100%. The addition of methanol was found not to speed up the LPME process and extractions from plasma were performed in 45 min to reach equilibrium. Because approximately 55-70% of the final analyte concentrations were achieved within the initial 10 min of the LPME process, validation was accomplished after 10 and 45 min of LPME. In general, the results with 10 and 45 min were almost comparable, with precision data in the range 1.2-11.1% (RSD) and with linearity in the concentration range 20-1000 ng mL-1 (r = 0.999). In conclusion, excellent LPME results may be achieved in a short time under non-equilibrium conditions with a minor loss of sensitivity. In cases of drug-protein interactions, methanol may be added to ensure a high extraction recovery.

AB - Recently, we introduced an inexpensive and disposable hollow fiber-based device for liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) where ionic analytes typically were extracted and preconcentrated from 1-4 mL aqueous samples (such as plasma and urine) through an organic solvent immobilized in the pores of a polypropylene hollow fiber and into a 10-25 μL volume of acceptor phase present inside the lumen of the hollow fiber. Subsequently, the acceptor phase was directly subjected to the final analysis by a chromatographic or electrophoretic method. In the present work, attention was focused on LPME of the basic drugs amphetamine, pethidine, promethazine, methadone and haloperidol characterized by substantial differences in the degree of protein binding. Drug-protein interactions in plasma resulted in reduced recoveries and substantially increased extraction times compared with extraction of the drugs from a pure water matrix. However, by addition of 5-50% methanol to the plasma samples, recoveries were comparable with LPME from water samples and ranged between 75 and 100%. The addition of methanol was found not to speed up the LPME process and extractions from plasma were performed in 45 min to reach equilibrium. Because approximately 55-70% of the final analyte concentrations were achieved within the initial 10 min of the LPME process, validation was accomplished after 10 and 45 min of LPME. In general, the results with 10 and 45 min were almost comparable, with precision data in the range 1.2-11.1% (RSD) and with linearity in the concentration range 20-1000 ng mL-1 (r = 0.999). In conclusion, excellent LPME results may be achieved in a short time under non-equilibrium conditions with a minor loss of sensitivity. In cases of drug-protein interactions, methanol may be added to ensure a high extraction recovery.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036091113&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1039/b110105f

DO - 10.1039/b110105f

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 12081037

AN - SCOPUS:0036091113

VL - 127

SP - 608

EP - 613

JO - The Analyst

JF - The Analyst

SN - 0003-2654

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 231653219