Integration (of Immigrants) in the European Courts’ Jurisprudence: Supporting a Pluralist and Rights-Based Paradigm?

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Integration (of Immigrants) in the European Courts’ Jurisprudence : Supporting a Pluralist and Rights-Based Paradigm? / Bottero, Matteo.

In: Journal of International Migration and Integration, 2023.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Bottero, M 2023, 'Integration (of Immigrants) in the European Courts’ Jurisprudence: Supporting a Pluralist and Rights-Based Paradigm?', Journal of International Migration and Integration. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-023-01027-7

APA

Bottero, M. (2023). Integration (of Immigrants) in the European Courts’ Jurisprudence: Supporting a Pluralist and Rights-Based Paradigm? Journal of International Migration and Integration. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-023-01027-7

Vancouver

Bottero M. Integration (of Immigrants) in the European Courts’ Jurisprudence: Supporting a Pluralist and Rights-Based Paradigm? Journal of International Migration and Integration. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-023-01027-7

Author

Bottero, Matteo. / Integration (of Immigrants) in the European Courts’ Jurisprudence : Supporting a Pluralist and Rights-Based Paradigm?. In: Journal of International Migration and Integration. 2023.

Bibtex

@article{276304c8f35c4058b9ba1306579abcff,
title = "Integration (of Immigrants) in the European Courts{\textquoteright} Jurisprudence: Supporting a Pluralist and Rights-Based Paradigm?",
abstract = "The concept of integration is the subject of various immigration policies but is still lacking a proper legal definition. In view of the abiding interest of the EU Member States to preserve their sovereignty over immigration, it is at serious risk of being instrumentalised for this purpose. Taking such circumstances into account, this article reflects on the model of integration resulting from the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights and questions the capacity of the two courts to advance a pluralist and rights-based paradigm of integration. On the one hand, it acknowledges the progressive enhancement of the protection of the immigrants{\textquoteright} fundamental and human rights. On the other hand, it points out the contradictions of a narrative that appears intrinsically incompatible with the very idea of pluralism by conceiving integration primarily as civic and cultural assimilation and placing most of the integration burden on the immigrants{\textquoteright} side.",
keywords = "Faculty of Law, immigration, integration, Family reunification, expulsion, Court of Justice of the European Union, European Court of Human Rights",
author = "Matteo Bottero",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1007/s12134-023-01027-7",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of International Migration and Integration",
issn = "1488-3473",
publisher = "Springer",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Integration (of Immigrants) in the European Courts’ Jurisprudence

T2 - Supporting a Pluralist and Rights-Based Paradigm?

AU - Bottero, Matteo

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - The concept of integration is the subject of various immigration policies but is still lacking a proper legal definition. In view of the abiding interest of the EU Member States to preserve their sovereignty over immigration, it is at serious risk of being instrumentalised for this purpose. Taking such circumstances into account, this article reflects on the model of integration resulting from the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights and questions the capacity of the two courts to advance a pluralist and rights-based paradigm of integration. On the one hand, it acknowledges the progressive enhancement of the protection of the immigrants’ fundamental and human rights. On the other hand, it points out the contradictions of a narrative that appears intrinsically incompatible with the very idea of pluralism by conceiving integration primarily as civic and cultural assimilation and placing most of the integration burden on the immigrants’ side.

AB - The concept of integration is the subject of various immigration policies but is still lacking a proper legal definition. In view of the abiding interest of the EU Member States to preserve their sovereignty over immigration, it is at serious risk of being instrumentalised for this purpose. Taking such circumstances into account, this article reflects on the model of integration resulting from the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights and questions the capacity of the two courts to advance a pluralist and rights-based paradigm of integration. On the one hand, it acknowledges the progressive enhancement of the protection of the immigrants’ fundamental and human rights. On the other hand, it points out the contradictions of a narrative that appears intrinsically incompatible with the very idea of pluralism by conceiving integration primarily as civic and cultural assimilation and placing most of the integration burden on the immigrants’ side.

KW - Faculty of Law

KW - immigration

KW - integration

KW - Family reunification

KW - expulsion

KW - Court of Justice of the European Union

KW - European Court of Human Rights

U2 - 10.1007/s12134-023-01027-7

DO - 10.1007/s12134-023-01027-7

M3 - Journal article

JO - Journal of International Migration and Integration

JF - Journal of International Migration and Integration

SN - 1488-3473

ER -

ID: 341495635