Arguing Against Security Communitarianism

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Arguing Against Security Communitarianism. / Bilgin, Pinar.

In: Critical Studies on Security, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2016, p. 176.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Bilgin, P 2016, 'Arguing Against Security Communitarianism', Critical Studies on Security, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 176. https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2015.1065117

APA

Bilgin, P. (2016). Arguing Against Security Communitarianism. Critical Studies on Security, 3(2), 176. https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2015.1065117

Vancouver

Bilgin P. Arguing Against Security Communitarianism. Critical Studies on Security. 2016;3(2):176. https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2015.1065117

Author

Bilgin, Pinar. / Arguing Against Security Communitarianism. In: Critical Studies on Security. 2016 ; Vol. 3, No. 2. pp. 176.

Bibtex

@article{68fa1d5e24b34e2cacdd07c45d4a00ca,
title = "Arguing Against Security Communitarianism",
abstract = "Anthony Burke{\textquoteright}s {\textquoteleft}security cosmopolitanism{\textquoteright} is a fresh and thought-provoking contribution to critical theorizing about security. In this discussion piece, I would like to join Burke{\textquoteright}s call for {\textquoteleft}security cosmopolitanism{\textquoteright} by way of arguing against {\textquoteleft}security communitarianism{\textquoteright}. I understand the latter as a particular approach that seeks to limit the scope of security to one{\textquoteright}s community – be it the {\textquoteleft}nation-state{\textquoteright} or {\textquoteleft}civilization{\textquoteright}. I will suggest that arguing against {\textquoteleft}security communitarianism{\textquoteright} requires paying further attention to the postcolonial critique of cosmopolitanism.",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, postcolonial , critical security studies, security, cosmopolitalism, postcolonial",
author = "Pinar Bilgin",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/21624887.2015.1065117",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "176",
journal = "Critical Studies on Security",
issn = "2162-4887",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Arguing Against Security Communitarianism

AU - Bilgin, Pinar

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Anthony Burke’s ‘security cosmopolitanism’ is a fresh and thought-provoking contribution to critical theorizing about security. In this discussion piece, I would like to join Burke’s call for ‘security cosmopolitanism’ by way of arguing against ‘security communitarianism’. I understand the latter as a particular approach that seeks to limit the scope of security to one’s community – be it the ‘nation-state’ or ‘civilization’. I will suggest that arguing against ‘security communitarianism’ requires paying further attention to the postcolonial critique of cosmopolitanism.

AB - Anthony Burke’s ‘security cosmopolitanism’ is a fresh and thought-provoking contribution to critical theorizing about security. In this discussion piece, I would like to join Burke’s call for ‘security cosmopolitanism’ by way of arguing against ‘security communitarianism’. I understand the latter as a particular approach that seeks to limit the scope of security to one’s community – be it the ‘nation-state’ or ‘civilization’. I will suggest that arguing against ‘security communitarianism’ requires paying further attention to the postcolonial critique of cosmopolitanism.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - postcolonial

KW - critical security studies

KW - security

KW - cosmopolitalism

KW - postcolonial

U2 - 10.1080/21624887.2015.1065117

DO - 10.1080/21624887.2015.1065117

M3 - Journal article

VL - 3

SP - 176

JO - Critical Studies on Security

JF - Critical Studies on Security

SN - 2162-4887

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 169962272