Wildlife value orientations among hunters, landowners and the general public: a Danish comparative quantitative study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Standard

Wildlife value orientations among hunters, landowners and the general public : a Danish comparative quantitative study. / Gamborg, Christian; Jensen, Frank Søndergaard.

In: Human Dimensions of Wildlife, Vol. 21, No. 4, 2016, p. 328-344.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Gamborg, C & Jensen, FS 2016, 'Wildlife value orientations among hunters, landowners and the general public: a Danish comparative quantitative study', Human Dimensions of Wildlife, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 328-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2016.1157906

APA

Gamborg, C., & Jensen, F. S. (2016). Wildlife value orientations among hunters, landowners and the general public: a Danish comparative quantitative study. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 21(4), 328-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2016.1157906

Vancouver

Gamborg C, Jensen FS. Wildlife value orientations among hunters, landowners and the general public: a Danish comparative quantitative study. Human Dimensions of Wildlife. 2016;21(4):328-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2016.1157906

Author

Gamborg, Christian ; Jensen, Frank Søndergaard. / Wildlife value orientations among hunters, landowners and the general public : a Danish comparative quantitative study. In: Human Dimensions of Wildlife. 2016 ; Vol. 21, No. 4. pp. 328-344.

Bibtex

@article{ed56a0d9d43f492d800339d8cbad263a,
title = "Wildlife value orientations among hunters, landowners and the general public: a Danish comparative quantitative study",
abstract = "This article examined wildlife value orientations among hunters (n = 1,130) and landowners (n = 1,207) in comparison to the general public (n = 1,001 adults) in Denmark, a highly urbanized European country. Respondents were categorized into four value types based on their responses to 19 statements. Significant differences in wildlife value orientations were found. Mutualists and distanced dominated in the public; most landowners and hunters were utilitarian followed by pluralist. Male hunters were more utilitarian than female. More active hunters were more utilitarian; hunters belonging to a hunting association were more utilitarian than those who did not belong to associations. Full-time farmers were more utilitarian than part-time farmers, and conventional farmers were more utilitarian than organic farmers. No significant difference with regard to residence for all three groups was found. Future studies should link what landowners and hunters actually do for the wildlife, and what the influencing factors are (e.g., incentive schemes) with their wildlife value orientations.",
keywords = "Outdoor life, landm{\ae}nd, J{\ae}gere, {\O}kologisk, ???Jagt???, Stakeholders",
author = "Christian Gamborg and Jensen, {Frank S{\o}ndergaard}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/10871209.2016.1157906",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "328--344",
journal = "Human Dimensions of Wildlife",
issn = "1087-1209",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Wildlife value orientations among hunters, landowners and the general public

T2 - a Danish comparative quantitative study

AU - Gamborg, Christian

AU - Jensen, Frank Søndergaard

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This article examined wildlife value orientations among hunters (n = 1,130) and landowners (n = 1,207) in comparison to the general public (n = 1,001 adults) in Denmark, a highly urbanized European country. Respondents were categorized into four value types based on their responses to 19 statements. Significant differences in wildlife value orientations were found. Mutualists and distanced dominated in the public; most landowners and hunters were utilitarian followed by pluralist. Male hunters were more utilitarian than female. More active hunters were more utilitarian; hunters belonging to a hunting association were more utilitarian than those who did not belong to associations. Full-time farmers were more utilitarian than part-time farmers, and conventional farmers were more utilitarian than organic farmers. No significant difference with regard to residence for all three groups was found. Future studies should link what landowners and hunters actually do for the wildlife, and what the influencing factors are (e.g., incentive schemes) with their wildlife value orientations.

AB - This article examined wildlife value orientations among hunters (n = 1,130) and landowners (n = 1,207) in comparison to the general public (n = 1,001 adults) in Denmark, a highly urbanized European country. Respondents were categorized into four value types based on their responses to 19 statements. Significant differences in wildlife value orientations were found. Mutualists and distanced dominated in the public; most landowners and hunters were utilitarian followed by pluralist. Male hunters were more utilitarian than female. More active hunters were more utilitarian; hunters belonging to a hunting association were more utilitarian than those who did not belong to associations. Full-time farmers were more utilitarian than part-time farmers, and conventional farmers were more utilitarian than organic farmers. No significant difference with regard to residence for all three groups was found. Future studies should link what landowners and hunters actually do for the wildlife, and what the influencing factors are (e.g., incentive schemes) with their wildlife value orientations.

KW - Outdoor life

KW - landmænd

KW - Jægere

KW - Økologisk

KW - ???Jagt???

KW - Stakeholders

U2 - 10.1080/10871209.2016.1157906

DO - 10.1080/10871209.2016.1157906

M3 - Journal article

VL - 21

SP - 328

EP - 344

JO - Human Dimensions of Wildlife

JF - Human Dimensions of Wildlife

SN - 1087-1209

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 162379435